Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 12,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
He can order, as Ronald Reagan did, parole units to stop returning parolees to prison for minor violations of parole. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 1:09 pm
The court followed the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Aug. 25, 2011) (unpublished), the United States District Court, Northern District of California, dismissed a class action securities fraud complaint against Hansen Medical Inc. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
” Healy v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
The United States undoubtedly has robust public policy favoring free expression. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 3:15 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:37 pm
The full text of the decision can be read by clicking here: HARLICK v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 10:38 am
Like this case.The case is South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
Suquamish Indian Tribe (Treaty Fishing Rights)United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
Zepeda (Major Crimes Act, Indian Status)United States of America v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
Judge Tallman begins this opinion with the line: "The United States Constitution and federal law require that crimes be prosecuted where the offense was committed. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:48 am
A three-judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals unanimously struck down a state voter ID law previously upheld by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
mod=googlenews_wsj, on United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 8:57 am
In 2021, a Ninth Circuit three-justice panel held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) didn’t preempt AB 51, and thus California could enforce its prohibition on mandatory employment arbitration agreements (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 10:56 am
Hu, Asenqua, Inc., Asenqua Capital Management, LLC, AQC Asset Management, Ltd., and Fireside Capital Management, Ltd.Case number: 09-cv-1177 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: March 18, 2009Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 26, 2013 5/17/2013 8/15/2013 2013-48 SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:03 am
Finally, in 2016, the Ninth Circuit published its opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
In Central Coast Forest Assoc. v. [read post]
