Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
(e) The decision of the Judges to be final. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
It is helpful to start with the dissenting reasons of Justices Côté[xi] and Brown in LSBC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 4:57 am by José Guillermo
 Artículo 2.- Modifi car el artículo 2 de la Ley N° 30341 Modifícase el artículo 2 de la Ley N° 30341, Ley que fomenta la liquidez e integración del Mercado de Valores en los términos siguientes: “Artículo 2. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
The SG’s Empty Ethics Case Against Jane Doe’s LawyersA few days ago, Solicitor-General Noel Francisco submitted a Reply Brief for Petitioners in Hargan v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm by Giles Peaker
The Tribunal held, contrary to the council’s contention in that case, that the periodic tenancies were “a continuation of the original agreement and not three separate and different agreements and it therefore followed that the tenant had a material interest …” This was in reliance on a Valuation Tribunal decision in Oyston v Leeds City Council (27 July 2011) [Which I think is this one] However, the Upper Tribunal preferred the argument in found in a… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:52 am by Nick Austin and Sofia Papaspyropoulou
The Report (and enclosed draft legislation, called the “Draft Bill”) provides the following illustrative, non-exhaustive list: (a) bills of exchange, (b) promissory notes, (c) bills of lading, (d) ship’s delivery orders, (e) warehouse receipts, (f) mate’s receipts, (g) marine insurance policies, (h) cargo insurance certificates (section 1(2) of the Draft Bill). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
If it isn’t, then how on earth can the UK contend that domestic law ever complies with the procedural safeguards required in McCann v UK and Cosic v Croatia? [read post]