Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 1701 - 1720 of 32,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 6:42 am
These were described by the SRSG in the 2008 SRSG Report 8/5: The general nature of the duty to protect is well understood by human rights experts within governments and beyond. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Doe's Complaint alleges that on November 8, 2021, Defendant Michael Oeser stalked, harassed, and sexually assaulted her while they attended a work-related conference at a Marriott hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm
Co. at *7-8.ANDA as ProductIn a case such as this, the ‘product’ is the drug de- scribed in the ANDA. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm by Josh Blackman
• Article VI provides further support for distinguishing the President from "Officers of the United States" because the oath taken by the President under Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 is not the same as the oath prescribed for officers of the United States under Article VI, Clause 3. 312. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover the claim amended by the introduction of the disclaimer does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [12] Consequently, the Board is of the opinion that the amendment of claim 1 violates A 123(2). [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 11:37 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/504(b-1)(A)(1) But the court does not have to follow those guidelines. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  How long does the representation go on, and does it comprise "continuous representation"? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:20 pm by Matthew Kolken
 In support of my argument I provided case law from the Board of Immigration Appeals that set forth that participation in the ARD program is not a conviction for immigration purposes as it does not mirror the definition of conviction as set forth in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The same applied for the 11th to 12th years following decisions T 170/83 [6], and T 152/82 [8-9].The RS rejected both the main and the auxiliary request.The Board partially allowed the appeal:[2] Under A 86(1), first and second sentences, renewal fees for the European patent application shall be paid to the EPO in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. [read post]