Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 29,811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
., 34 F.4th 1196, 1210 (11th Cir. 2022). [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:11 pm
Patterson, 853 F.3d 298. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 10:58 am
Feb. 4, 2020), aff’d, 837 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 4:17 am
RELATIONS – FLYING OBJECTS Biden administration officials yesterday defended their decision to shoot down unidentified flying objects over North America this weekend. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 11:54 am
§ 3553(f), or on substantial assistance under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
The 1999 alimony obligation remained in place until May 2021 when defendant moved to terminate alimony on three grounds: he was seventy-four years old, and beyond retirement age; he had been unemployed since March 2020, surviving solely on his Social Security; and he had medical issues, which impacted his ability to work. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric’s note: Prof. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Seagate Technology LLC, 803 F.3d 659 (Fed. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The officer had recently seized suspected drugs from the defendant in another incident, so the officer had a drug dog sniff the defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 11:19 am
., 282 F. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am
United States, 884 F.2d 300 (7th Cir.1989); Douglas G. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Kapral, 45 F.4th 621 (2d Cir. 2022). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
But as the district judge pointed out, 555 F. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Cal. 2006) 439 F. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:37 am
As Plaintiffs … walked by Defendant Jane Doe 2 and Defendant Jane Doe 3 to continue into the exhibit, the Does used expletives in reference to the students, some of whom are minors, including J.K., stating: "The f—king pro-life. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
Came together to defend a stronger and safer Europe. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Or, to paraphrase William F. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:40 am
See Reynolds, 779 F.3d at 228–29. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
In an opinion in a much-publicized case, filed December 28, 2022, and later ordered published on January 26, 2023, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3), upheld the City of Livermore’s (“City”) approval of a 130-unit affordable housing project on a downtown infill site and its accompanying determination that the project was CEQA-exempt under Government Code section 65457 (“Section 65457”). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
A plaintiff seeking to bring a derivative claim on behalf of a corporation, limited liability company or limited partnership must be “suitable” and represent the interests of the business. [read post]
