Search for: "Dept of Justice" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Tishman v Bogatin,--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1392995 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which directed defendant to pay 40% of the cost of the parties' older child's college education. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justices Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels dissented in part in separate memoranda. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The dissenting justice also found that the arbitration clause's reference to a valuation dispute "does not compel a finding that the parties' dispute over the value of the decedent's membership interest must be arbitrated." [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The dissenting justice also found that the arbitration clause's reference to a valuation dispute "does not compel a finding that the parties' dispute over the value of the decedent's membership interest must be arbitrated. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Who should decide questions of human rights, Parliament or the courts? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm by Steve Hall
"Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:31 am by Michael Lowe
You can read the expose for yourself, entitled “Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept.” and written by Spenser S. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Washington Post's Spencer Hsu tackles a subject at the federal level ("Convicted defendants left uninformed of forensic flaws found by Justice Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Charter of Rights turns Canada into a 'constitutional' trendsetter Skurka's Spin: Charter anniversary must transcend party politics Convicted defendants not told of forensic flaws found by US Justice Dept. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, reversed and reinstated the action ( 80 AD3d 401 [1st Dept 2011] ). [read post]