Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 3:34 am
., Nos. 2004, 4:08-MD-2004 (CDL), Case No. 3:07-cv-00088, No. 3:07-cv-00101, 3:07-cv-00102, 3:07-cv-00130, Slip op. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
Dove, Nos. 285 Ga. 647, ___ S.E. 2d ___, 2009 WL 1649681(Ga. 2009). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:40 am
What does this mean? [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:38 am
" Moreover, use of the "TM" designation does not make unregistrable matter registrable. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, Case Nos. 05-2399, 06-2020 & 06-2021. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Peak problem, which holds that turning on your computer makes a copy and is therefore infringing, and Congress enacts a law making it legal to turn on your computer in order to service it (the particular case) but does not deal with the broader holding. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Patent Nos. 6,558,194 (the ‘194 patent); D440,539 (the ‘539 patent); and D519,076 (the ‘076 patent). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Amazingly, this often does not happen. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:30 pm
Patent Nos. 6,433,277 (the ‘277 patent), 6,630,728 (the ‘728 patent) and 6,455,356 (the ‘356 patent) under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:59 am
In any case, "the mere fact that goods are expensive does not mean that their purchasers are sophisticated or immune from source confusion. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The company also failed to treat the sludge to reduce pathogens and maintain records at its land application site at the Doe Run Desloge Mine Tailings Site in Desloge, Mo. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:32 am
., Nos. 305, 2009 and 309, 2009 (Del. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 am
Consumerbargaingiveaways) came to a different conclusion, finding that section 17529.5 was not preempted, even though this statute does not require a showing of reliance or damages. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 3:29 pm
I expected the vast majority of law professors to be against such an idea, but it was 20 "Yeses" against 20 "Nos" with 9 respondents being ambivalent on such a midterm week. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
Nos.47, 117). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:13 am
., Nos. 09-2280, 09-3020, Slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
County of Wayne, Nos. 283413 & 283414 (published Mar. 25, 2010), the Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Jansen, concluded that Wayne County did not qualify for governmental immunity under MCL § 691.1419 against claims for damages that resulted when sewage backed up into the plaintiffs’ homes after a significant rainfall. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:55 pm
The fact that the police officer issues a citation to the other driver does not assign blame for the accident. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The main reliefs sought in the petition are as under:- a) Declare Respondent No.2 to 6 disqualified of being directors of the company and remove the Respondnet Nos. 2 to 6 from the directorship of the Respondent Company as they are acting contrary to their fiduciary relationship of the Respondent Company. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:33 am
., Nos. 08-30223 / 09-30052 (3-16-10) (McKeown joined by Hawkins and Bybee). [read post]
