Search for: "Does 1-59"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,025
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
However, Indiana law does not prohibit the act of surrogacy itself, and recent court rulings have been favorable to surrogacy. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:43 pm
In February 2015: 83% of capped households were capped by £100 or less a week. 59% of capped households had between 1 and 4 children and 35% had 5 or more children. 63% of capped households constituted a single parent with child dependants. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
It does not include lost opportunities, disincentives to innovation, the inability to raise money due to the decrease in collateral, and the loss of jobs without those investments. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:33 am
--> (Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015 )Chinese authorities have invited commentaries on the Second Draft of the People's Republic of China Foreign Non-Governmental Organizations Management Law (Draft) (Second Reviewed Draft) (中华人民共和国境外非政府组织管理法（草案）（二次审议稿）, which they… [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
On February 1, 2011, Paul Schwaegler, M.D., did an L5-S1 re-exploration with re-do decompression, including excision of a large re-herniation and a fat graft. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 12:10 pm
The Plaintiff declined this offer and proceeded to trial seeking over $1 million in damages. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
Narragansett Indian Tribe, No. 14-1106, Order at 1 (1st Cir. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
” 764 F.2d 58, 59-60 (1st Cir. 1985). [read post]
29 May 2015, 11:06 am
See Pretrial Order #59, In re Cook Medical, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
S., at 59, n. 14). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:38 am
S., at 59, n. 14). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
Recently, Bexis attended the DRI drug and device committee spring conference. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
After the judge entered the findings and judgment outlined above, Westmont filed a motion to disqualify the trial judge, a rule 59 motion to alter or amend the judgment, and a rule 60(b) motion for relief. [read post]
24 May 2015, 5:50 pm
Nor does it constitute a written acknowledgment or promise under which the mortgagors intended to again become personally liable on the debt pursuant to section 59 of the Civil Practice Act. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
” 1 Page 586 [162 Misc.2d 24] A warrant was issued for respondent’s arrest. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
As Lord Reed puts it: [S]ection 193(1) cannot be concerned only with the reason for the loss of accommodation which the applicant occupied immediately before he became homeless. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:57 pm
Rule 9(b) does not allow a complaint . . . merely [to] lump multiple defendants together but require[s] plaintiffs to differentiate their allegations when suing more than one defendant . . . and inform each defendant separately of the allegations surrounding his alleged participation in the fraud.Id. at *59. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:00 am
Or does the silence of the Act mean that it is open to creditors and debtors to make a deal under the general rule that use of the technology is not disablement or even that its use is “permitted by law” as contemplated by s. 59(2)? [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:43 am
Redundancy under the 1992 Act has a much wider meaning than it does in the context of individual unfair dismissals. [read post]
14 May 2015, 8:51 pm
Section 503 retains the ability for individuals subject to nondisclosure requirements to seek judicial review (59). [read post]
