Search for: "English v. English"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 11,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 7:41 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In Hak v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 8:02 am
At this point, I envision my next post on App Store matters on May 3, when the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 5:10 am
Canada, and Bridgestone v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:19 pm
Crawford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:41 am
Introduction Under English law, charterers’ obligation to pay hire as it falls due is absolute but the right to withdraw a vessel in case of default in charterers’ obligation to pay does not arise automatically. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 8:17 am
This Kat is pondering green vs white asparagusAs this Kat sees Germany gearing up for Spargel (asparagus) season, an equally exciting harvest can be found around the IP blogs.CopyrightThe news which lit up the IP blogosphere last week was indisputably the US Supreme Court's ruling in Google v Oracle, which determined that the incorporation of program code into the Android operating system was fair use by Google. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Devgan v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Urge CAT to Apply English Law in Swipe Fee SuitsLaw360 – April 12, 2021 (subscription required) Nearly 40 Italian companies have told the Competition Appeal Tribunal that they should be able to rely on English law in their damages claims against Visa and Mastercard over swipe fees. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
And, he continues, the way to limit the right of social media companies to exclude users from their platforms, is to look at how the English, and later the US government have traditionally handled certain private companies known as “common carriers”. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
In 1923, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Over-vigorous application of a statutory offence might be greeted in similar terms to those employed by the Lord Chief Justice in the Twitter Joke Trial case (Chambers v DPP), an appeal from conviction under s.127 of the Communications Act 2003: “The 2003 Act did not create some newly minted interference with the first of President Roosevelt’s essential freedoms – freedom of speech and expression. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 10:45 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
(English MT translation by Deepl.)Eine Rückzahlungsmöglichkeit der Beschwerdegebühr gemäß Regel 103 (4) c) EPÜ kann es auch dann geben, wenn ein Antrag auf mündliche Verhandlung nicht vom Beschwerdeführer zurückgenommen wurde, sondern von einem anderen Verfahrensbeteiligten, der keine Beschwerde eingelegt hat (siehe Nrn. 8.3 - 8.9 der Entscheidungsgründe).The decision is in German. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:05 am
Mr Justice Birss observed in Illumina v MGI that a limiting definition of a feature in the description, limits the scope of the claim. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 10:30 pm
This decision was instrumental in the English Court of Appeal’s 2018 ruling in Uber bv v Aslam. [read post]
