Search for: "English v. State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 6,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Unknown
Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) [preprint]- Chapter 4: Commentary on United States v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 Langton v Sussman & Watkins2025 NY Slip Op 02765Decided on May 7, 2025Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided on May 7, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:14 am by Editor
9thCircuit-Seal_svg.png A divided panel, reversed conviction based on invalid jury trial waiver form which was printed only in English, signed by a non-English-speaking drug conspiracy defendant, and translated by his defense attorney; the attorney was not certified as an interpreter under applicable law and FRE 604 “provides a means for the court to qualify an individual as an interpreter, employing the methodology used for qualifying expert… [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The English common law made no New York state residency distinction. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The English common law made no New York state residency distinction. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm by Evan Lee
Section 2252(b)(2) is not ordinary English – not ordinary written English, and certainly not ordinary conversational English. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:34 pm by Afro Leo
  This aspect was dealt with again on appeal by the English and Wales Court of Appeal in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as The London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limitedand (2) Ecotive Limited [2017] EWCA Civ 1729). [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
  It had pointed to the English criminal case of Oxford v Moss (1979) 68 Cr. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:30 am by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:50 pm
Did the WTO enact it under WTO Agreement Article V:1 authority? [read post]