Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 9,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) UCLA hosts the journal Dukeminier Awards: Best Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law Review Articles. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) Earlier today, I blogged the syllabus of the majority opinion, and noted my earlier thoughts that the statute is likely constitutional. [read post]
6 May 2012, 4:39 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Karen Lugo (National Review Online) has the most thorough English-language account that I’ve seen: While deciding to acquit Lars Hedegaard [on April 20], president of the Danish Free Press Society, of intending to speak hatefully for public dissemination, the [Danish Supreme Court] emphatically affirmed a statute according to which anyone who “publicly or with the intent of public dissemination issues a pronouncement or other communication by which a… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
(Eugene Volokh) Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Written Description) builds on the patent law analogy for scholarship, originally developed by Prof. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last week about a Georgia judge’s refusal to let a Muslim man wear a kufi (a sort of cap) in court. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Paintedcrow v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Rosales v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:47 am
(Eugene Volokh) I don’t have anything helpful to say on the ethical, public relations, or interfaith amity questions raised by the ground zero mosque. [read post]
D.C. Council Considering Requiring Speech Code in City Parks and the University of District Columbia
31 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The proposed law would mandate that public and charter schools, city parks, city libraries, and the University of District Columbia banany gesture or written, verbal or physical act, including electronic communication, that is reasonably perceived as being motivated either by any actual or perceived characteristic, such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, or a mental, physical or sensory… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s what happened in the middle of a trial of parents for killing their child through child abuse (felony murder under Georgia law): [T]he prosecutor, in the final moments of her concluding argument on behalf of the State, “clicked” her fingers at which signal one of the deputies in the courtroom turned out the lights and an associate prosecutor “popped out a cake out of a grocery bag” complete with eight candles, which were then lit… [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The trouble is that it appears that he does indeed have a criminal record. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last week about the People’s Rights Amendment, which has been introduced by Congressman Jim McGovern. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From today’s King v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:24 am
(Eugene Volokh) My friend Haym Hirsh developed these puzzles for G4G9, the ninth Gathering for [Martin] Gardner, and kindly agreed to let me blog them: Martin Gardner’s relative Dr. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So a panel of the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:12 pm
(Eugene Volokh) [UPDATE: Post bumped because I can now link to the full text of the opinion, with thanks to Victor Gonzalez-Garcia.]The case is Ex parte Roque Cesar Nido Lanausse and here’s what Prof. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:43 am
There is a series of posts at The Volokh Conspiracy discussing the case: Eugene Volokh has some “small observations” about the lawsuit; Jonathan Adler suggests that the suit “makes Oklahoma and Nebraska look like fair-weather federalists”; Randy Barnett contends that the lawsuit “seriously misreads the Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:34 pm
Eugene Volokh of The Volokh Conspiracy has a long and very interesting entry today about the term. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:49 am
Eugene Volokh predicts that a Minnesota jury’s award will not stand; not only are people “constitutionally entitled to speak the truth about others, even with the goal of trying to get them fired,” but the “First Amendment constrains the interference with business relations tort, just as it constrains the infliction of emotional distress and other torts. [read post]
