Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 8,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 2:37 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Neal v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:21 am
(Eugene Volokh) The post is here; here’s the introduction and conclusion:Okay, so can we finally stop with the idiotic, divisive, and destructive efforts by “majority sections” of Western nations to bait Muslim members with petulant, futile demonstrations that “they” aren’t going to tell “us” what can and can’t be done in free societies? [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The newly-enacted Missouri Revised Statutes § 162.069.4 provides,No teacher [in a Missouri public school] shall establish, maintain, or use a nonwork-related internet site [i.e., a “website or web page used by a teacher primarily for personal purposes and not for educational purposes”] which allows exclusive access with a current or former student [i.e., “any person who was at one time a student at the school at which the teacher is employed… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So held the Tenth Circuit on Tuesday in Sampson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Andrew Napolitano condemns this recently enacted statute: Last week, President Obama signed into law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Teesdale v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:24 am
(Eugene Volokh) My friend Haym Hirsh developed these puzzles for G4G9, the ninth Gathering for [Martin] Gardner, and kindly agreed to let me blog them: Martin Gardner’s relative Dr. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
(Eugene Volokh) Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Written Description) builds on the patent law analogy for scholarship, originally developed by Prof. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Paintedcrow v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last week about the People’s Rights Amendment, which has been introduced by Congressman Jim McGovern. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:47 am
(Eugene Volokh) I don’t have anything helpful to say on the ethical, public relations, or interfaith amity questions raised by the ground zero mosque. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s what happened in the middle of a trial of parents for killing their child through child abuse (felony murder under Georgia law): [T]he prosecutor, in the final moments of her concluding argument on behalf of the State, “clicked” her fingers at which signal one of the deputies in the courtroom turned out the lights and an associate prosecutor “popped out a cake out of a grocery bag” complete with eight candles, which were then lit… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So a panel of the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:48 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The trouble is that it appears that he does indeed have a criminal record. [read post]
D.C. Council Considering Requiring Speech Code in City Parks and the University of District Columbia
31 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The proposed law would mandate that public and charter schools, city parks, city libraries, and the University of District Columbia banany gesture or written, verbal or physical act, including electronic communication, that is reasonably perceived as being motivated either by any actual or perceived characteristic, such as race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, or a mental, physical or sensory… [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:49 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From today’s King v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:19 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged last week about a Georgia judge’s refusal to let a Muslim man wear a kufi (a sort of cap) in court. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is Rosales v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 4:39 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Karen Lugo (National Review Online) has the most thorough English-language account that I’ve seen: While deciding to acquit Lars Hedegaard [on April 20], president of the Danish Free Press Society, of intending to speak hatefully for public dissemination, the [Danish Supreme Court] emphatically affirmed a statute according to which anyone who “publicly or with the intent of public dissemination issues a pronouncement or other communication by which a… [read post]
