Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 4,635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am
United States. [read post]
24 May 2020, 9:30 pm
It explores the flowering of his legal career and the impact that law had on him and his understanding of himself; his growing involvement with the American Revolution as polemicist, as lawyer, as congressional delegate, and as diplomat; and his commitment to defining and expounding ideas about constitutionalism and how it should work as the body of ideas shaping the new United States.The book traces his part in launching the government of the United States under… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:14 am
La decisión corresponde al caso United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:35 am
Completing a process which began one year and one week earlier, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule in the Federal Register on October 21, 2016 which will change the fees for forty-two different trademark filings. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:20 am
The ex-employees have also returned control of a number of Linked-In Groups to Whitmar. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
He was instead found to be “part of” the Taliban, and detainable on that basis–even though he never took up arms against the United States. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 4:42 am
GOLD, Defendants;No. 06 CV 6707 (ERK)(VVP); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
The issuance of these decisions terminates the reexamination process, and since the requests were filed on an "ex parte" basis, they cannot be appealed by RJR. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Alabama ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:15 pm
Details of your financial life become part of the public record and people like ex-wives, parents, bosses and friends may very well get notice of your filing and you can assume that some of these "nosy neighbors" will review your filing. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:23 am
Different folks, different cultures and different parts of the United States all have slightly (or more than slightly) different parenting norms. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am
That decision was incredibly important: It effectively eliminated the need to get prior approval before transferring personal data from the EU to the United States, and left enforcement of privacy norms regarding that data to be conducted primarily in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
In addition, employees and other individuals who do or have recently lived, worked, or maintained accounts or other assets outside the United States also should consult with qualified tax advisors promptly about whether they have any unresolved liabilities or responsibilities and if so, concerning the advisability of using any of the newly announced programs to redress these concerns. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 7:38 pm
District judges in Kenton County and Jefferson County have found that portions of the new residency restrictions violate the ex post facto clause of both the United States and Kentucky Constitutions because the new restrictions are punitive in nature rather than remedial. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:58 am
In Ex parte Potts (Case No. 2011-004700, in Application Serial No. 11/690,745, decision issued July 17, 2012) [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:02 am
§ 1973, applies to state felon disenfranchisement laws that result in discrimination on the basis of race; and (2) whether the Massachusetts felon disenfranchisement scheme established in 2000 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as applied to those Massachusetts felons who were incarcerated and yet had the right to vote prior to 2000? [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
Quite predictably, the federal district court promptly dismissed that state-law claim after concluding that the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution barred that claim from being brought in federal court. [read post]
