Search for: "Frank Banks" Results 1701 - 1720 of 5,215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Insured Exclusion Precludes D&O Policy’s Coverage for FDIC Failed Bank Lawsuit: In an important decision concerning D&O insurance coverage in connection with FDIC failed bank claims, the Tenth Circuit, applying Kansas law, held that a D&O policy’s insured vs. insured exclusion unambiguously precluded coverage for claims brought by the FDIC as receiver of a failed bank against the bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Circuit’s recent ruling striking down part of Dodd-Frank conflict mineral disclosure rule [Business Law Prof] More on suit challenging constitutionality of FATCA, the law complicating many expatriates’ lives [Paul Mirengoff, PowerLine] “Jury Will Put A Price On Terrorism — And Stick A Bank With The Bill” [Daniel Fisher, Reuters on Arab Bank settlement] Operation Choke Point: “How a program meant to stamp out fraud has put a… [read post]
After all, this decision didn’t deal with retailers, banks or dating sites – it addressed a major hotel player and, by implication, all operators, brands and owners in the industry. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:29 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin Banks and other companies subject to the CFPB’s jurisdiction face the possibility that the CFPB could begin using its authority under Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Dodd-Frank Act (which proscribe unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices) to regulate cybersecurity policies and procedures. [read post]
Meanwhile, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL) is advancing the “Financial Regulatory Improvement Act of 2015,” which seeks to amend a number of provisions of Dodd-Frank. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 12:56 pm by Kelley D. Bledsoe
For example, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a relatively new federal agency formed in 2011 under The Dodd-Frank Act, explicitly targets its enforcement powers at the conduct of both financial institutions and their service providers. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:19 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” Another article, “Bank Investment in Securitizations: The New Regulatory Landscape in Brief,” summarizes important new requirements related to investment in securitizations as a result of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, including potential effects on bank capital. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:13 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
(It is interesting that the CFPB, which had the authority under Dodd-Frank to obtain such information under 12 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
In an effort to promote the objectives of the Dodd-Frank Act, the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
That’s the message of a letter sent to shareholders earlier this year by Frank H. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 5:55 am by Steve Bainbridge
My UCLAW colleagues Steven Bank and George Georgiev have posted a concise and damning appraisal od Dodd-Frank's executive compensation provisions: This essay argues that regulatory reforms introduced... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nick Goseland, Above the Law] Tags: banks, California, class action settlements, corporate governance, Frank Easterbrook, securities litigationBanking and finance roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 3:53 pm by Louisiana Employment Law Letter
Mark Adams “Much ado about nothing” is just one literary turn of phrase that comes to mind when considering the initial uproar over Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the long wait for its implementing regulations. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:40 pm
As a matter of practicality though, I wouldn’t bank on lenders going out of their way to accommodate applicants who have anything other than a pristine record. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  This is sloppy banking, and it violates the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits financial providers from engaging in unfair or deceptive practices.So today, we are ordering the bank to return about $11 million to consumers who did not receive money that should have been deposited into their accounts. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Mintzer Law
This law attempts to give banks and loan agencies some extra protection. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:56 am by Developer
This law attempts to give banks and loan agencies some extra protection. [read post]