Search for: "Frank v. State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
The key response to this abuse, recommended by a Committee headed by Senator Frank Church that investigated and documented it thoroughly, was a new paradigm of intelligence under law. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm by Stephen Griffin
Rev. 1459 (2014)Nicole Huberfeld, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard, and Kevin Outterson, Plunging into Endless Difficulties: Medicaid and Coercion in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Runyon (Necessary Party; Fishing Rights)Frank’s Landing Indian Community v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Ernest Badway
See https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/commission-statement-regarding-bartko-v-sec.html. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Ninth Circuit: If the Supreme Court can call a health-care exchange established by the federal government “an exchange established by [a] State,” see King v. [read post]
  He added that national banks are subject to state law to a much greater extent under Dodd-Frank than previously was the case, so concerns about excessive preemption are misplaced. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:49 am by petrocohen
  He also holds an A/V Preeminent® rating from the world’s leading lawyer referral service, Martindale-Hubbell. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Tourre, the court stated in dicta that “[b]ecause the Dodd-Frank Act effectively reversed Morrison in the context of SEC enforcement actions, the primary holdings of this opinion affect only pre-Dodd Frank conduct. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]