Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 4,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2018, 2:13 pm
Book review: You Don’t Own Me: How Mattel v MGA Entertainment Exposed Barbie’s Dark SideThis book, written by Orly Lobel, describes the behind the scenes action of the dispute between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, i.e., Barbie v Bratz. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:00 am
To understand what Germany’s new “hate speech” law says, or how the “Right to Be Forgotten” is expanding under the GDPR and around the world, the WILMap is a convenient and constantly evolving resource to help interested parties navigate online liability laws. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am
Key Findings Although there is no empirical standard for what constitutes a “fair share” of the tax burden, tax fairness is often used by leading international organizations, such as the European Commission, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) such as the Tax Justice Network, to justify higher taxes on businesses and corporations. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:01 am
Balev, 2018 SCC 16 (37250) A finding that the children here were habitually resident in Germany at the time of the alleged wrongful retention is a requirement for a return order under the Hague Convention. [read post]
13 May 2018, 3:15 am
Google – Astonishing, But Not Surprising https://t.co/pYsvr2jrpA 2018-05-08 First Amendment Doesn’t Protect Encouraging Readers to Make Anti-Semetic Attacks–Gersh v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 10:26 am
& Akros Chemicals Ltd. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
In opposition proceedings against the European patent in this case, the Division admitted an intervention on the basis that the patent proprietor had, in Germany, instituted independent evidentiary proceedings (BSV proceedings) against the intervener, whereby a court-appointed inspector is empowered to take evidence of possible infringement. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am
In opposition proceedings against the European patent in this case, the Division admitted an intervention on the basis that the patent proprietor had, in Germany, instituted independent evidentiary proceedings (BSV proceedings) against the intervener, whereby a court-appointed inspector is empowered to take evidence of possible infringement. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:34 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Comment: In Germany, you take down some words regardless of content, so it may depend on what law you’re applying. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:45 am
New case: Lewis v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Both Kiobel v. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
Sophia Brill returned to last Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:07 pm
Today's Qualcomm v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
In contrast, a competing French firm operating in Germany would only face the German tax rate of 30 percent on its German income. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
PatentsGetting the priorities rightPatently-Oanalyses the Federal Circuit decision in Droplets, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:51 am
Here is Mike’s report: Isentress II, decision on royalty rate in Merck v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:02 am
There is of course whatever remains, as constitutional law, of Eisner v. [read post]
