Search for: "Grant v. United States of America" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:24 am by Mark S. Humphreys
One aspect of this is discussed in a 2003, United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals case. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
Acting Energy Envoy for the United States, Amos Hochstein, said that the Kurdistan Regional Government has arrested people accused of smuggling. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
Constitution—has the bland ring of a human resources circular: “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
After all, Article II provides that “[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America,” yet no one doubts that the President may transfer executive authority to his underling [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:51 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStock * United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Joel E. Tasca
In addition, several amicus briefs in support of granting certiorari have been filed in Spokeo, which can be found here (by Pacific Legal Foundation), here (by ACA International), here (by Trans Union LLC), here (by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America), here (by eBay Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google, Inc. and Yahoo! [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:12 pm
§ 141(c) (“A party to . . . a post-grant review who is dissatisfied with the final written decision of the [PTAB] . . . may appeal the [PTAB’s] decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 13-9972.I'll have more to say on this list later.Over at SCOTUSblog, all their "breaking news" blurb has to say about the list is that the Court took no action on the same-sex marriage cases. [read post]