Search for: "Harris v. Does" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
That critique reached a new peak in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
For publication opinions today (3): Arthur Harris v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am by Stephen Wermiel
At first glance, the Confrontation Clause does not seem very complicated. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
 Two of the complaints were by members of the Royal Family, Prince Harry and Prince Andrew. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
Harris Associates is still in the news as well. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[M]ere speculation of a loss resulting from an attorney’s alleged omissions . . . is insufficient to sustain a claim” for legal malpractice” (Gallet, Dreyer & Berkey, LLP v Basile, 141 AD3d 405, 405-406 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421 [1st Dept 1999]). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by SHG
And how does one prove such a thing? [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), does not apply to a summary order. [read post]