Search for: "Head v. The University" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
Supreme Court's precedent ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
    In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
For instance, a 2012 study on student perceptions of Wikipedia found that 92% of respondents in a freshman course and 72% of respondents in an upper-year course at a large public university used Wikipedia as a research tool when writing academic papers. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 11:44 am by Diane Marie Amann
Common Article 2 and Common Article 3 have endured significant re-examination in the counterterrorism climate that’s prevailed since the attacks of September 11, 2001, readers of decisions such as Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The case is centred upon an article in Sydney’s Daily Telegraph  with the heading “Tailor’s alter ego as a gunrunner”. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
(In those days, although not more recently, the ACLU, which Nadine then headed, took a strong First Amendment stand against such laws.) [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm by Lovechilde
  The most realistic alternative is the universally loathed Ted Cruz. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   Perhaps the government knew a battle was looming, and by blindsiding Apple with an ex parte filing, provided them with a head start in its public relations campaign. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
[Note to employers: This is a wrong-headed and dangerous approach.] [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
“We agree with the near-universal view,” Justice Richter wrote, “that the courts of one state do not have the power to dissolve a business entity formed under another state’s laws,” adding in a footnote that “although this proceeding involves a limited liability company, we perceive no reason why the rule should be different for corporations, partnerships and other business entities. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
“We agree with the near-universal view,” Justice Richter wrote, “that the courts of one state do not have the power to dissolve a business entity formed under another state’s laws,” adding in a footnote that “although this proceeding involves a limited liability company, we perceive no reason why the rule should be different for corporations, partnerships and other business entities. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
“We agree with the near-universal view,” Justice Richter wrote, “that the courts of one state do not have the power to dissolve a business entity formed under another state’s laws,” adding in a footnote that “although this proceeding involves a limited liability company, we perceive no reason why the rule should be different for corporations, partnerships and other business entities. [read post]