Search for: "High v State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 35,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Depending upon who you ask, this has either always been the law in Maryland (as Maryland high court tells us in Maurer v. [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm by Josh Blackman
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:46 am
In Elafonissos Fishing and Shipping Company v Aigaion Insurance Company SA [2012] EWHC 1512 (Comm), the High Court found that the defendant insurer must pay for losses suffered by the claimant's fishing vessel as a result of Cyclone Bondo in Madagascar in 2006.Aigaion Insurance Company SA (Aigaion) denied liability on the basis that Elafonissos Fishing and Shipping Company (Elafonissos) had breached a warranty to lay up the vessel in port from November 2006 to February 2007. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:35 am
Last week, I blogged about the Supreme Court's opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 225 (11 March 2010) Farinloye & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 203 (11 March 2010) Priory Caring Services Ltd v Capita Property Services Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 226 (11 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) McVey & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Ally Kvidt
On July 25, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order directing state officials to start removing homeless encampments across the state. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
Nevertheless, while hardly a moral high point in the history of the Court, WABE did emphasise that it was not enough to just want a neutrality policy. [read post]