Search for: "His Law v. USA"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2018, 8:26 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
Mark Lawrence and his Diocese of South Carolina before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Considering the massive debate in USA on the matter it may be worth comparing the laws on signals intelligence and metadata collection in Europe and the USA. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:42 pm
Pliva USA, Inc., No. 12-30319, 2013 U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:54 am
The federal district court in Washington was not swayed by the employer’s assertions that it first offered the job at issue to a male over 40 and that the younger female replacement was actually given a different job than held by the employee (Holtz v Skanska USA, Inc, October 28, 2014, Bryan, R). [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 12:11 pm
Father testified as to his fruitless efforts to locate the child and a police report summarized such efforts. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
CJEU rules in telmisartan SPC disputeAfter his own earlier post on the CJEU’s decision in Case C‑577/13, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
Santander Consumer USA Inc., in which the court held that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act does not apply to debt buyers, arguing that the decision “gave some of the worst bottom-feeders in the economy a free pass to break the law. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:52 am
Mobile USA Ins. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court held in Miller v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm
However, the Federal Circuit found error with the Final Determination, in particular finding that ALJ Luckern erred in placing the burden of proving authorization on Bourdeau rather than on Deere in violation of its opinion in SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf previews next week’s oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Louisiana that Miller v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]
UK court discusses copyright protection of fictional characters and defences for parody and pastiche
9 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In a judgment handed down yesterday - Shazam v Only Fools The Dining Experience and Others [2022] EWHC 1379 (IPEC) - the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) answered 'yes' and applied guidance derived from EU law, including the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Cofemel (Katposts here).Let's see what happened.BackgroundOnly Fools and Horses (OFAH) is a successful BBC TV series that ran between 1981 and 1991, with also some… [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc. [read post]
