Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 6:10 am
Here is the abstract: In the recent case of Holder v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:46 am
Zeneca and ICI agreed to: (1) pay Barr $21 million; (2) pay Barr’s supplier $35.9 million; and (3) supply Barr with Zeneca-manufactured tamoxifen for resale in the United States at a high royalty rate. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am
, United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
On the occasion of today's iPhone 5 presentation, I'm now going to explain why it's highly unlikely that sales of Apple's new smartphone will be disrupted by any patent holder in the coming months. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm
See buySAFE, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
At any rate, I would view the $5 per-unit refund to BlackBerry as another indication of my $20 per-unit royalty estimate not having been off base.If Qualcomm's royalty levels are indeed extremely high, it comes as no surprise that various major automative and information and communications technology companies are interested in the ongoing FTC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:36 pm
(See United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm
’s ban on handguns (Heller v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Changes made to address similar findings on the processor issue in the CUSMA challenge were met with a sharp rebuke from the United States and a new trade challenge. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
Moreover, Judge Higginson points out that both HTC and Ericsson, as well as the United States as amicus curiae, requested jury instructions on apportionment. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 10:52 pm
The case of Glossip v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
United States. [read post]
