Search for: "International Lighting Corp."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 1,834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2009, 2:58 am
"); Simmons Fastener Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:56 am
Liquid Carbonic Corp., 637 F.2d 1001, 1004 (5th Cir. 1981). [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Class 46) India Geographical indication protection for Tanjavur dolls (Spicy IP) Economic implications of copyright: the exhaustion principle (International Law Office) Extensions of copyrights? [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:38 am
Animal Feeds International Corp., 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 10:44 pm
Light said. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:29 pm
Meanwhile a law offensive against Hamas or Fatah would cast international light on different set of champions for the Palestinian side then those with starring roles in this offensive. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Jurisdiction Speedway Motorsports International, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:26 pm
JSL Corp., No. 01-294 (D. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 9:58 am
The Washington press corps, with dismayingly few exceptions, served as a stenographic lapdog for the government in the run-up to the Iraq War. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:38 am
"
Sealed Air Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 5:07 pm
Fine, president of Biltrite Corp. in Waltham. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 3:26 am
On a recent internal call hosted by Bair, she quickly shut down examiners when they complained about an inability to spend sufficient time examining the banks. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Diamond decided that, in light of a recent dispute that erupted among some of the plaintiffs lawyers, the allocation of fees among plaintiffs lawyers from more than 30 firms must be approved by the court. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:27 am
Unfortunately, the jihadi groups have no diplomatic corps of their own that we can talk to. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:04 am
Jeez, the FDCA is getting as complicated as the Internal Revenue Code these days.That means we've got really comprehensive preemption, except that it doesn't apply to "the product liability law of any state. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
In ruling on the motion, the court must view the evidence in the light mostfavorable to the opposing party. [read post]
