Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 4:18 am
S. 266 (2000), and Alabama v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:05 am
LinkedInFacebook v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Kerr stated in her factum, the “approach enunciated in Pettkus v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 13 November 2018 there was a hearing in the Privy Council (Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lords Briggs and Kitchin) of an Isle of Man libel appeal, Nugent v Willers. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:43 am
" NRA brief in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:11 am
The case that led to this ruling was Quigg v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm
This was before the Court decided Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:03 am
See generally Kerr v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 5:25 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am
The Volokh Conspiracy again covers the Court's denial of cert. in Noriega v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 10:15 am
“ Justice Alito, in his majority opinion in Kentucky v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
In hearing these appeals, Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed, Carnwath and Briggs also had the opportunity to hear argument on whether undeserving parents should be allowed to profit from the residence of their innocent children by “piggybacking” off their rights and best interests. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
Just yesterday, in Virginia v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:16 pm
Orin Kerr is a law professor and a smart guy. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:26 am
Consider Justice Antonin Scalia's words in dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Rose, JD, MBA, Principal, Rachel V. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
