Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 1701 - 1720 of 6,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Similar issues are playing out now in the United States, where the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am by Mary B. McCord
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 5:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The primary issue is whether Plaintiff Pueblo of Jemez has the exclusive right to use, occupy, and possess the lands of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (“Valles Caldera”) pursuant to its allegedly unextinguished and continuing aboriginal title to those lands. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has always been viewed as being more sympathetic to patent holders than to alleged infringers--but not in every single aspect of patent law. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am by Eric Rassbach
The Blaine Amendments found in most state constitutions, including Montana’s, resulted from Blaine’s failed attempt to amend the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:36 pm by Amy Howe
United States, Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
As part of the rollback of environmental regulations, the Trump Administration has finally completed their longed for repeal of the 2015 definition of Waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  But again, I'm focused on the Ninth Circuit here.) (3) Four years later, in a follow up case, United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm by Shirin Sinnar
  For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]