Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 82,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
It looks like there will be separate trials in this case. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
If it can be shown that it was dark outside, jurors are less likely to believe an eyewitness. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Goldberg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:11 pm
If he was really serious about protecting the sanctity of life as he sees it, he would do more than nibble about the edges with makeweights like the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: he would state, clearly and forcefully, that Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
Dukes, Comcast v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
21 May 2014, 11:00 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
In order to conduct such transactions, among other things, the managing institution likely has to be licensed in some fashion under state law, the customer’s identity must be known, and the institution has to report the transaction. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
But environmentalists are likely to view today’s decision as a combination of good and bad news. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Additional Resources: Fridman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:39 pm
Sheetz’s challenge faced setbacks in state court, largely due to the application of precedent set by the California Supreme Court in San Remo Hotel v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:07 am
We had stated that the decisions would have huge ramifications on international commerce. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:27 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 12:21 am
I read over the amicus brief filed by the Virginia Attorney General and others in the case of King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
This case is likely to be taken up as a "grant and hold" pending resolution of Iskanian v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:25 am
US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:36 am
In Gutierrez v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 2:55 pm
Like a bad dream (or a toxic ex-partner), abortion has made yet another unwelcome visit to the United States Supreme Court, thanks to the State of Texas. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:39 am
In a new article in the June 2008 issue of Antitrust Source, Howard Marvel discusses what the rule of reason could and should look like in the Post-Leegin world as well as the different proposals to a rule of reason approach articulated by the states and the FTC in the recent Nine West consent order modification. [read post]
