Search for: "Long v. Card" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Providing shareholders with minimum rights of access to the company's proxy card, and allowing companies to provide shareholders with additional rights but not to take away the set minimum, is consistent with the long-standing and established role of the proxy rules (and the securities laws in general) and the division of labor between them and state corporate law. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:23 am by Simon Fodden
All of that was a long time ago. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am by Neoshia Roemer
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
Having purchased an SX Pro a user can download SX OS from the first of the Target Websites onto a blank microSD card which they then insert into their Nintendo Switch together with the SX Pro. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:31 am by Victoria Clark
They always play either Russian card or any other, political opponents bring accusations against the current head of state and here there are a lot of lines of attack. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
   Our encounter with Irenas was all too brief that long-ago summer. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by David Kris
” Under [the law], the government can then present session identifying information or calling card numbers (which are components of a CDR . . .) identified in the first “hop” CDRs to phone companies to serve as the basis for companies to return the second “hop” of CDRs. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Josh Blackman
We know that there were already four justices on the court in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
He may not be guaranteed victory in court, but if there are such issues than a takedown is ill-advised, especially following recent rulings in the Lenz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by admin
For more on the Court’s decision, see Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]