Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 46,278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
Particularly given the Obama administration's recent statement that it will generally no longer go after medical marijuana clinics as long as their activities are legal under state law. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:37 am
The post Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:46 pm
This is a long opinion, and entails an elaborate discussion of the Establishment Clause as applied to a fairly unique set of facts. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 12:12 am
Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
From Judge Dale Drozd's opinion in Clifton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
The long battle over custody of Baby Veronica, the child at the center of last Term’s Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 10:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:05 am
McBride v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Hochstein et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:16 am
Federal Circuit rules Illinois litigation privilege bars claims in long-running trade dress dispute, but upholds some counterclaims. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
So long as the rights contained in that statute satisfy the Supreme Court, tribal court convictions may be used as prior convictions under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the denial of review in Rogers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
And, this excerpt refers to Democrat Thomas V. [read post]
