Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 2:53 am
National Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
(I'm not saying here that in fact this is true; I'm merely stating this as hypothesis). [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
See especially Lord Mansfield s influential decisions on this score. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Sumption and Lord Briggs. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:36 am
The Sethusamudram case (Rama Gopalan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:17 pm
On this last point Lord Justice Rix did not agree. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
” The full hearing came before Lord Justice Carnwath, Lord Justice Jackson and Mr Justice Hedley. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
From an extended examination of Chadwick LJ’s judgment in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, which expressly raises ‘fairness’ on the basis of relevant conduct as the criterea by which share of interest should be assessed, in the absence of express agreement, and Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which appears to limit ‘fairness’ and expressly concerned shares in a property in joint names, where Oxley v Hiscock concerned a… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
The three categories identified by Lord Diplock in Council of the Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (essentially for review of administrative action) are not exhaustive. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:39 am
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled last week in the case of Morrision et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
However, there was a suggestion at the time of the Copenhagen Conference, stemming from a report by Lord Turner’s non-governmental Committee on Climate Change which was picked up by the media, that the enhanced EU commitment would translate into a 42 percent target for the UK. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
[See also, The State of Bihar vs. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
Interpretation of a jurisdiction clause is a matter of national law (Benincasa, Knorr-Bremse (supra), and in Fiona Trust, Longmore LJ in the Court of Appeal, applauded by Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords, stated that ‘the words “arising out of” should cover “every dispute except a dispute as to whether there was ever a contract at all”’. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:40 pm
I will begin by summarising the present state of that law. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm
and Lord Hoffmann, commenting on the decision in Bieber, observed that Article 3 was prescribing the minimum standard, not a norm. [read post]
