Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 4,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 3:11 am
Upon considering the rule in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, Lord Reed reasoned that the review officer did not consider whether the cause of the appellant’s current state of homelessness was her surrender of her tenancy at the hostel. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 24 February 2015 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am
Many state courts still apply the Chevron Oil test regarding their own state laws. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
In light of the wording used by Lord Neuberger, PCCM was effectively trying to obtain a similar monopoly without registration, relying on its repute among UK residents. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
Lord Neuberger &n [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:59 am
In giving the leading judgment Lord Neuberger stated that courts in the UK have consistently held that it is necessary for a claimant to have actual goodwill, in the sense of a customer base, in this jurisdiction before it can satisfy the requirement for the law of passing off. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:29 am
Giving the majority judgment Lord Clarke stated that S & Marper was concerned only with the position of suspected but non-convicted persons, not convicted persons. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
In the very type of case under consideration, it can fairly be said that anyone who is homeless is vulnerable, as Lord Glennie pointed out in Morgan v Stirling Council [2006] CSOH 154, [2006] HLR 95, para 4. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
In Bright Lord Judge CJ cited from Lord Camden CJ’s judgment in Entick v Carrington and from William Pitt, Earl of Chatham. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:26 am
A decision seeking to answer this question was faced by the then-named House of Lords in the UK in the early part of the 21st century in Consorzio Del Prosciutto Di Parma v Asda Stores Limited and Others. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:00 am
" Steinhausen v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
In Holder v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 3:03 am
Lord Carnwath stated that the CJEU said producing a plan complying with art 23(1) did not itself mean the member state had met its obligations under art 13, and it was for the national court to take “any necessary measure” so that the authority establishes a plan required by the Directive when there had been a failure to comply with art 13 and lack of application to postpone the deadline under art 22. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
The dissent is notable, if only for the fact the President of the court, Lord Neuberger, and Lord Sumption are the two dissenters. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
Adapting the speech of Lord Bridge to the terms of s 61(7). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
Secondly, on 22 April 2015, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (Lords Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Carnwath and Toulson) heard an appeal from Dominica in the case of Pinard-Byrne v Lennox Linton. [read post]
