Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 1701 - 1720 of 120,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2019, 1:21 am
Indian Subcontinent Author US Government Licence Reproduced licensed by the US Government Source Wikipedia Indian Subcontinent Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Recorder Amanda Michaels) Asian Business Publications Ltd v British Asian Achievers Awards Ltd and Another [2019] EWHC 1094 (IPEC) (2 May 2019) This was an action for passing off. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:58 am by Giles Peaker
The presence of the property guardians in their living accommodation and the property may have deterred persons from entering the property, but it did not convert the use made of the living accommodation. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:36 pm
However, the court leaves open the possibility that other, more intrusive, uses of DNA may be actionable. [read post]
26 May 2012, 12:00 am
(Prior May 26 posts are here, here, here, here, and here.) [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 2:03 pm
And when they do, there are some predictions out there on what may be your best used car buys, according to Paul A. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am by Jeff Welty
What about inquiring about a motorist’s travel plans, or a passenger’s, where such inquiries may bear on the likelihood of driver fatigue but also may be used to seek out inconsistencies that may be evidence of illicit activity? [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:50 pm
"This appeal presents questions of first impression for our Court: (1) Under what circumstances may a plaintiff file a complaint using a pseudonym? [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:47 pm
A worthwhile article in the latest edition of The Urban Lawyer about settling land use disputes with processes that may not adhere strictly to the usual permit consideration procedures. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:38 am by Robert L Abell
The Kentucky Court of Appeals has assured us that Kentucky's Dram Shop Act did survive its decision in Taylor v. [read post]