Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 1701 - 1720 of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
As to what he sends TalkLeft, he's always on the mark. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:00 pm by Sydney Li
Yesterday and today, Mark Zuckerberg finally testified before the Senate and House, facing Congress for the first time to discuss data privacy in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 12:38 pm
I examined the issue through the prism of the discussion of constitutions in the Report of the 19th Chinese Communist Party Congress held in Beijing in October 2017. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:15 am by Michael C. Dorf
Sure, most Republican members of Congress oppose spending money on such things as health, education, and combating climate change. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:47 am by Susan Hennessey, Benjamin Wittes
Vice Chairman Mark Warner issued the following statement in response: I have seen the press reports suggesting that the White House enlisted senior members of the intelligence community and Congress to counter allegations regarding issues that are currently under SSCI investigation. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:21 am by Paul Rosenzweig
To address this, the Courts and Congress have historically given the President broad leeway to obtain foreign intelligence. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Having worked at OLC for many years, I genuinely can't even imagine what it would be like to come to work each day with a mandate to produce this sort of legal advice. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
For example, back in August 1992, about a month before I filed the original Petition to Cancel in the Harjo case, contesting all of the team’s then-existing federal registrations for marks containing the racial slur, the team filed a new application to cover goods as opposed to services, for the first time. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the US Constitution grants to Congress the power... [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:06 pm
It makes no policy sense whatsoever, and was probably inadvertent on Congress' part. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am by Paul Stephan
A much harder question (and one to which I did not pay much attention back in the day) is whether Congress has any power in the first place to adopt Section 214(d). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am by Dennis Crouch
” [16-341-texas-et-al] Without the Government Brief, Mark Lemley’s brief (on behalf of 61 professors) may be seen as the most influential. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:51 am by Steve Vladeck
" Yes, the Tenth Amendment presumably reserves power to the states, but--in marked contrast to the commandeering cases--it doesn't inform the analysis of whether Congress has exceeded its authority. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:13 am
I mean that is what they were designed to do. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Sincerely, Andrew PiattCampaign ManagerSchauer for Congress [read post]