Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1701 - 1720 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
He's hanging out with his brother, Jim Doe, while they watch the Ohio State-Michigan game and the subject of John's empty house comes up in conversation. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm by WIMS
The Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo Logan) applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to discharge dredged or fill material from a mountain-top coal mine in West Virginia into three streams and their tributaries. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
Here is an early result of the pernicious decision in Herring v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
For the reasons stated below, we REVERSE the district court's denial of the State's motion for clarification and REMAND with instructions that the district court grant the State's motion for clarification consistent with this opinion. 07a0294p.06 2007/08/03 Williams v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
§ 1983 against officials of the State Bar of Michigan in connection with their denial of his application for a license to practice law. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
§ 1983 against officials of the State Bar of Michigan in connection with their denial of his application for a license to practice law. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
Michigan, which the Court may overturn in Citizens United. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:16 am by Steve Vladeck
Appearing as an amicus in support of Arizona, the United States offered a similar set of arguments. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm by WIMS
      The Act requires that more than three quarters of advanced biofuel sold in the United States after January 1, 2022 be cellulosic biofuel. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
According to the plaintiffs, the defendants, including the city, emergency manager, retirement officer manager and finance director, violated the Contract and Bankruptcy Clauses of the United States Constitution and deprived them of a property interest without due process or just compensation. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  It did the same thing back in 2007 in State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm by Steve Vladeck
And on that point, Michigan and the United States – and, it seems likely, a majority of the Justices – all agree. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Harrison filed an action against Montgomery County under the Takings Clause of the Fifth (and Fourteenth) Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Because a finding of frivolousness prevents an alien from obtaining any other relief under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") for which he might otherwise qualify (except for withholding of removal, which Lazar does not seek), the IJ denied Lazar's application for an adjustment of status based on his marriage to a naturalized United States citizen. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am by WIMS
Following a bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Vermont ruled in plaintiffs' favor on the Atomic Energy Act preemption claim and the dormant Commerce Clause claim, and found that the Federal Power Act preemption claim was not ripe. [read post]