Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
Ash v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Ash v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
If nothing else it makes confidence and belief in the system difficult for minorities in the U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:43 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am
Fear of a Black Planet could not be released today. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm
In his close-minded abuse of power he chided the minority’s defense of fundamental fairness as mere “political correctness”. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:58 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:28 pm
It smacks of “Big Brother” and “Minority Report. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:43 pm
There is a strong argument to be made that all sentencings are inherently biased and that the data exists – if only one would look for it – that blacks and minorities are routinely sentenced more harshly than their white counterparts. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:20 pm
The United States Supreme Court even ruled in Kimbrough v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
Let’s say that you, like Hawaii-born Barack Obama, have a white mother and a black father. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
We’re presuming that New Jersey has a minority tolling statute, but even that shouldn’t let a plaintiff slide for 30 years. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
Cases such as Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:21 pm
The paper Independent Directors and Firm Value: Evidence from an Emerging Market by Rajesh Chakrabarti, Krishnamurthy V. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Loving was decided in 1967 after almost all states outside the South allowed blacks and whites to marry. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
Black. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
For example, in the Peters v Kiff decision, he recognized the importance of the right to trial by jury when he held that a white criminal defendant could challenge the exclusion of black jurors. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:35 pm
This case was Williamson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:35 pm
This case was Williamson v. [read post]
