Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 5:16 pm by Eva Arevuo
The issue has come to a head regarding the action of the Montana Supreme Court to uphold a state ban on corporate campaign spending, in seeming violation of Citizens United. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court today -- it was a unanimous opinion by Justice Kennedy -- said the Montana Supreme Court used the wrong test. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:02 pm by Maureen Cosgrove
PPL Montana (PPL) [corporate website], which owns a hydroelectric power dam on the Missouri River, brought the challenge after the state Supreme Court held [opinion, PDF] that the title to the riverbeds passed to Montana when... [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:06 am by Rick Hasen
  The Montana Supreme Court took Justice Kennedy at his word and looked at the state’s evidence of corruption to justify its law. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Kali Borkoski
The decision of the Montana Supreme Court was reversed. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:09 pm by Rick Hasen
Bloomberg BNA: “Challengers of Montana’s ban on corporate spending in state election campaigns will file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court “promptly,” seeking to overrule a state court decision that it is in conflict with the high court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:21 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issed an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0574, 2012 MT 42N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:35 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0243, 2012 MT 40, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Sam Favate
Supreme Court blocked Montana from enforcing a state law banning corporate political spending, after the Montana Supreme Court ruled in late December that the law could stand, even in the face of the 2010 Citizens United decision, which struck down limits on corporate and union electioneering. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:03 am by George Ticoras
Supreme Court has stayed a Montana Supreme Court decision upholding the state’s law prohibiting independent political expenditures, related to a candidate, by a corporation. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Coverage of the Court continued steadily throughout the holiday weekend, focusing on the Court’s stay of a decision by the Montana Supreme Court upholding that state’s century-old ban on corporate campaign spending. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:18 am by nflatow
” The high court issued a stay to block a Montana Supreme Court ruling that upheld a state campaign finance law. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:21 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Asked to Undo Montana Campaign Money Ban Vermont State Sues Dubie and RGA, Alleging 2010 Campaign Collusion State and Federal Communications produces a weekly summary of national news, offering more than 80 articles per week focused on ethics, lobbying, and campaign finance. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:19 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a Montana Supreme Court's ruling upholding the Montana state PAC requirement for corporate campaign expenditures, even in the face of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:23 pm by Jaimie Cremeans
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Friday blocked enforcement [order, PDF] of a Montana Supreme Court ruling, which upheld a state law [JURIST report] limiting the amount of money corporations can spend on campaigns, until it can consider an appeal from the corporations challenging the law. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:13 am by Rick Hasen
Supreme Court, it is not going to be at the margins by attempting to distinguish Citizens United (which is what the state supreme court attempted to do) or by debating how the law affects these particular petitioners. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Montana maintains that the state supreme court’s ruling does not conflict with Citizens United. [read post]