Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr F's argument before the Court of Appeal, was that either ss.118 or 124 of the 1985 Act imposed duties on local authorities, which were owed to their tenants. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Mr F's argument before the Court of Appeal, was that either ss.118 or 124 of the 1985 Act imposed duties on local authorities, which were owed to their tenants. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm by Brian Wright
  If the recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-875 (argued Tuesday), which raises the question whether capital gains income tax incurred due to the sale of the petitioners’ family farm is not an administrative expense owed by the bankruptcy estate and payable under a bankruptcy reorganization plan. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:22 am by Northern Exposure
“No”, said the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Hinke v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Chamber of Commerce in support of respondentAmicus brief of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America in support of respondent (forthcoming)Brief for respondent RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Ronald Mann
The Justices get a textbook statutory construction puzzle next week when they hear arguments on November 29 in Hall v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:49 pm by William Carleton
But when those two goals clash, the health and safety of the public and our first responders must be the priority. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
” On February 11, 2008, the Respondent served a notice to quit on the Appellant owing to rent arrears (which were subsequently paid) and, upon its expiry, commenced possession proceedings. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:49 am by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the Southern District of New York.In her complaint, Julie Taymor & Loh, Inc. v. 8 Legged Productions, LLC et al (Case No. 1:2011-cv-08002), the plaintiff alleges the musical's producers, Glen Berger, Jeremiah Harris and Michael Cohl, breached a contract that allegedly gave her approval rights over changes to the play's book and owe her royalties for performances since April when the snake-bit (radioactive spider-bit?) [read post]