Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
” State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am
Cypress Hills Cemetery, 184 AD3d 813; Parker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:26 pm
That court's record of "plain and repetitive" AEDPA error, Parker, 567 U. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Luke’s Hospital v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Rich Ford: Tell us about Brown v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
” Parker v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
In Parker v District of Columbia, banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep and use for protection of one's home and family would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:44 am
In this case, the Second Circuit upholds the preclusion of evidence (an illegal gun) because the search violated the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:42 am
Personal opinions on this topic are welcome too.An ADA from Parker County chimed in with some personal background:As an intern in the Fort Bend County DA's office, i got to write the appellate brief on Marcus Omar Winston v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:36 am
"Dogs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
,v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
The case is Rivera v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:33 am
But parents do win these cases.The case is E.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:24 am
Vicarious Liability of Catholic Church In the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Doe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:41 am
Parker, Lauren N. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Mays v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
That day has arrived.The case is Henry v. [read post]