Search for: "People v Challenger" Results 1701 - 1720 of 18,775
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
This made PQ's case that copying occurred challenging, resting on expert comparison of decompiled code and thus was "heavily circumstantial". [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
But then at some point, as you and others are fooled by human v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
”[5] HISTORICAL BACKGROUND An estimated 600,000 artworks were looted from Jewish people during the Nazi era.[6] The New York law defines the Nazi era as between 1933 and 1945, covering coercively exchanged property from the start of Hitler’s rise to power to the end of World War II. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm by NARF
Lost in translation: Absence of domestic implementation of international norms for the Indigenous Peoples of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2023, 10:32 am by Giles Peaker
  Some recent exciting challenges include R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin), Uduezue v Bexley LBC (2023) EWCA Civ 322, and R (Cort) v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter Section 230 Survives Yet Another Constitutional Challenge–Huber v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:23 am by Simon Lester
His focus here is China, but I suspect other people on his side of the political spectrum might point him to the various non-specific subsidies provided by the U.S. federal and state governments, which could now be subject to challenge through WTO complaints and also countervailed. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:52 am by Florian Mueller
The meeting room in Brussels was sparsely filled, with panelists probably outnumbering the audience, and they claimed to have about 100 online participants, while the webinars held by the European Commission two years ago to discuss SEP policy were typically watched by approximately 300 people (each). [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm by Sandra Park
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]