Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 52,291
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2012, 9:45 am
" This sentiment underlies the holding in the case. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
"Oh, and just when you thought the facts couldn't be any more bizarre:"At the time this case arose in 2012, appellant was 62 years old and Oceja was 29. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
But the owner of the dog who was killed then demanded restitution, which the trial court (a temporary judge) denied, saying that the owner could sue civilly if she wanted, but couldn't obtain a restitution order in a case involving an infraction.But the Appellate Division disagreed. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
But in situations like this, when there's such manifestly inappropriate conduct, I agree that it makes total sense to reverse and remand for a trial in which the jury decides the case based upon the actual evidence, not the non-evidence out of the mouth of the prosecutor. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
There are legions of cases that make crystal clear that even though the rule of lenity is supposed to be a cardinal principle of statutory interpretation in the criminal context, in practice, it's pretty much meaningless.Except in this case.A vice principal at a high school has sexual relations with a 14-year old student. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 2:35 pm
Now for the actual sentence that gets imposed in this case. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
Appellate tribunals often resolve complex issues of constitutional and statutory interpretation.But sometimes, even at the highest levels, the cases are relatively straightforward.Take, for example, how the California Supreme Court begins the month of June. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:07 pm
"Okay, there are lots of those types of cases. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
As long as (in my view) the case raises a nonfrivolous argument, you should at least identify it. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:42 pm
That's a straightforward conflict, and on an issue that recurs in innumerable cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
He also delves into a long list of precedential cases and historical cases such as Loving vs. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
Hanzi: ‘食 (eat) 族 (clan) 人 (people)’. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
You have to be a little, well, "different" when you threaten to kill people in an open and obvious way. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
I'm going to make allegations about the plaintiffs [victims] in this case that they aren't even human . . . . [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:01 pm
Nonetheless, I couldn't help feeling that a lot of this insanity was caused by something that might make many people go off the deep end as well: the perceived loss of a child. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
The National Security Letter case reported yesterday is Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:03 pm
Which is true testament an honest and rational attempt to properly distinguish a case: a description that makes the differences between the two cases matter, and make both cases understandable given their factual predicates.So I was very impressed with this opinion, especially since the issue seemed so facially intuitive at the outset. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
A better case might be made for overruling existing precedents, most notably Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:12 pm
The Ninth Circuit sitting en banc has decided US v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
Either way, you can bet on the Court’s eventual decision being both contentious and momentous; these are the kinds of cases that people will be studying a century from now, taking their place with Dred Scott, Plessy v. [read post]
