Search for: "People v. Christian" Results 1701 - 1717 of 1,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Spotts, The Christian Science Monitor, March 12, 2010 Move over global warming. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Something of greater urgency had bumped the survivors of a massacre within the last few weeks of as many as 2,000 people from the first half of the show. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023  Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Brewer, The United States a Christian Nation (1905) Louis Dembitz Brandeis, The Jewish Problem, How to Solve It  (1915 & 1919) William H. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The representatives raised transparency concerns following a ProPublica story about the Family Research Council, a right-wing Christian think tank based in Washington, D.C., getting reclassified as a church. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 6:35 am by Marc DeGirolami
I have found that a good meme can do as much to make, say, Marbury v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
In the case of the lift, however, ease of access for disabled people and other visitors is a compelling reason for making such provision in the manner proposed. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In this respect the respondents submitted two questions of law and requested that if neither the case was remitted to the Opposition Division, nor the requested corrections were allowed, they be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.The following document, related to inventive step over the combination of the teachings of documents D1 and D2, was also submitted:R15: Saint Gobain v Fusion Provida Ltd, Case No: A3/2004/2441.VI. [read post]