Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 2,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
(internal cites deleted) DiQuisto v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
At ACSblog, Martha Davis marks International Women’s Day with a discussion of Flores-Villar v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The judge, applied the accepted “classic test” for frustration given by Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham [1956] AC 696, 729: “frustration occurs whenever the law recognises that without default of either party a contractual obligation has become incapable of being performed because the circumstances in which performance is called for would make a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
The Court stressed that the Davis decision had found that statements made “in the course of police interrogation under circumstances objective [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:33 pm
V. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:09 pm
In Eolas v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am
Davies, 43 Texas Tech L. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm
Here are some preliminary observations on the opinions in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
The Court seems to be stretching its prior ruling in Davis v Washington prior ruling to the breaking point. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
Because I continue to adhere to the Confrontation Clause that the People adopted, as described in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:00 am
Sharon Davis - Click here for more information on Sharon Davis. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:33 pm
” [via LexisOne] People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Parke-Davis, 2000 WL 33910097, at *4 (M.D. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:30 am
We have already mentioned the application on 18 February 2011 in the case of Sky Andrew v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
"People like them because they're natural," Nesbitt said. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 3:52 pm
Service Co. v. [read post]
