Search for: "People v. Shorts"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 8,416
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am
In short, Ontario law may allow individual disparaging comments about the former employer and only prohibit such statements in rare cases. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
Effects of past chronic stress on explorative v. exploitative thinking—when people experience the world as harsh and unfair, people stick to what they know rather than exploring new options. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:57 pm
For example, in R. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:33 pm
In Leader v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
The most important Maryland case is Gordon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
LTC Lakin then became aware he was “on the short-list for deployment. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in, R. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:04 am
© 580 of 2003, Common Cause v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Town of Chester v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 5:54 am
Additional Resources: Vallejo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
In short, entitlement to an oral hearing is usually a discretionary matter. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:09 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Mendenhall v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry and McCreary County v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:08 pm
In short, we cannot say that the 75-month sentence required under Measure 11 would shock the moral sense of all reasonable people as to what is right and proper under the circumstances. [read post]
