Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 45,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
Because of all the initials for witnesses and crime victims, I had to literally draw a chart to try to figure out what was going on in this one.Palmer and S.H. go to a bar, S.H. leaves, and Palmer flirts with C.S. and takes C.S. back to Palmer's room and they start having sex, except Palmer can't keep an erection. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
The fact that the justices on the Court of Appeal may, in my estimation, not be as bright as I am, or may read the law the wrong way, shouldn't stop be from raising an argument that I believe correctly states the law. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:28 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:34 am
[Post by Venkat] United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:55 pm
Rippy v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
The dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:03 am
Plaintiff sues the Otisville people for the constitutional (due process) violation of denying him the right to appear in person for his hearing; he claims the failure to comply with the state directive cause his excessive force case to be dismissed.The case is Dixon v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:30 am
Kitazato v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
(See Martinez v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
However, as the case of Summer J. v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Page 567 658 N.Y.S.2d 567 172 Misc.2d 186 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
The very few mandates that are imposed on the people pertain to their fundamental duties as citizens of the United States, such as the duty to defend the country or to pay for its operation. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:27 am
Those of us who take the Fourth Amendment seriously, with its "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" from search and seizure, were dismayed by the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Florence v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:01 pm
The CoA in Rawlins / Meekins relied upon 3 opinions from other states:1) State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:43 am
Among other people, the Controller, the Secretary of State, and other elected officials, who did not like seeing members of their staff furloughed. [read post]
