Search for: "Robert v. State" Results 1701 - 1720 of 19,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 8:38 am by Race to the Bottom
(Securities and Exchange Commission, Complaint; Jeff Roberts, Decrypt). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am by Jon L. Gelman
(Travelers), and Travelers' ostensible insured, respondent Robert Alam. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
 The co-authors, Robert Hazell and Bob Morris, have also published a blog post summarising the conclusions of both reports, here. [read post]
Such characteristics include varying levels of anonymity available to blockchain transactors and the ability to instantaneously settle transactions worldwide.[14] For example, blockchain analysts and intelligence officials noticed that the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) used NFTs for recruiting and funding,[15] and that the ISIS-themed NFT was visible on at least one NFT trading website.[16] This recent finding illustrates the viability of using NFTs to fund illicit activities, not… [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am by SHG
Nevertheless, she also stated that “race-conscious admissions policies must be limited in time. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider three cases decided earlier this year.In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]