Search for: "Ryan v. Ryan"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 2:46 pm
” Callins v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Again, they could do this because: Ketamine is FDA-approved as an anesthetic; Drugs with one approved indication can be prescribed off-label for other indications; and The Ryan Haight Act allowed for Schedules II-V controlled substances to be prescribed over telehealth, without a prior in-person examination. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:04 pm
Ryan. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
Alternative Green Technologies, Inc., Mitchell Segal, Belmont Partners, LLC, Joseph Meuse, Howard Borg, David Ryan, Vikram Khanna, and Panascope Capital Inc.Case Number: 11-cv-09056 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case Filed: December 12, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 15, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-6 SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
Ryan Buda (A-45/5-07), State in the Interest of J.A. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
A New York Criminal Lawyer said that, it is alleged that on December 3, 1994 the defendant, committed the offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, Penal Law § 220.21 (1), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, Penal Law § 220.16 (1), in the County of Bronx. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
, RYAN PARK added his thoughts: JUSTICE ALITO: Mr. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
Ryan applies, while in McQuiggin v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
The case is Ryan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 3 November 2009 at Sheffield Crown Court a jury was sworn in to hear the trial of Ryan Ward for murder. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am
The Court also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Ryan v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 11:37 am
United States, No. 08-8095, and the rehearing petition in Ryan v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am
” “”The doctrine of collateral estoppel … precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding and decided against that party or those in privity, whether or not the tribunals or causes of action are the same” (Ryan v New York Tel. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
United States, 09–1395, or on newcomers Ryan v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:26 pm
In Harm v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
Lynaugh, and subsequently, in Penry v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 5:53 am
Ryan, 41 N.Y.2d 634 (1977) will further shed light on this issue. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 7:30 pm
During the COVID-19 PHE, the Ryan Haight Act’s in-person medical evaluation requirement was lifted under the fourth exception, thereby allowing DEA-registered practitioners to prescribe Schedule II-V controlled substances during audio-video telemedicine encounters and certain audio-only visits without requiring a prior in-person medical evaluation. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
