Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 6,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed Mileski's sentence. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court directed the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action in Paletta v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In Triple A International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In Triple A International, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 11:14 am
Link: Zachariasewycz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
In State Treasurer v Snyder, No. 298554, the Court of Appeals held that an incarcerated defendant did not have the right to disclaim his interest in his mother’s life insurance policy in order to avoid having it seized by the state. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:22 am
You may read Mann v Pischke here. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 6:40 pm
” The Michigan Supreme Court invited the Michigan Association for Justice, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, and the Michigan State Medical Society to submit amicus briefs. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 6:40 am
Texas v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
Romanko AC35507 - State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
App. 505, 715 N.W.2d 301 (Michigan Court of Appeals 2006) (downloaded material copied from websites).State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:42 pm
In Shanks v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
The factual recitation from the 6th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
In a forthcoming article for the Michigan Law Review, Carter Brace of the University of Michigan Law School explains that the Supreme Court in Milliken v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am
There is certainly no shortage of briefing to read: in addition to the petitioner’s brief (PDF) and the briefs of the three respondents — Regents of the University of Michigan (PDF), Board of Governors of Wayne State University (PDF) and Chase Cantrell, et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
The Michigan State Police crime lab contracted with an out-of-state forensic laboratory that produced a report concluding the sample matched the defendant's DNA.At defendant's trial, the Washtenaw County Prosecutor called the MSP lab tech and the out-of-state lab tech to testify about the matching DNA. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:21 am
The Michigan State Police crime lab contracted with an out-of-state forensic laboratory that produced a report concluding the sample matched the defendant's DNA.At defendant's trial, the Washtenaw County Prosecutor called the MSP lab tech and the out-of-state lab tech to testify about the matching DNA. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 12:47 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court explained that this deficiency was not jurisdictional because it did not implicate the State’s ability to charge the defendant. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
“In Michigan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 12:42 pm
” The administration sought to have the lawsuit dismissed based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
