Search for: "SEC v. Downe"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
In its decision in Chrismon, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
When D.C. opponents of the city gun law returned to the Circuit Court on Sept. 12, they interpreted the Court's decision as having struck down Code Sec. 7-2502.07 -- the disassemble-or-lock section -- because that provision "bans the home possession of all functional firearms -- handguns, rifles and shotguns. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
If there were any increases, the speeds would probably have brought up the times from the 10 to 15 sec. per song, making the number even more accurate. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
WilmerHale Nets SEC Honcho for L.A. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 7:08 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 1:29 pm
(Mercier v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
We look for a tenacious defensive battle and give the edge to the SEC Tigers, 17-16.Update: OK, here is a good question - where is the University of South Florida located? [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 2:52 pm
Strine, Jr. issued his ruling in Mercier v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:38 am
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:53 pm
The case, Porter v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:03 pm
Down the road, the broker messes up, defrauds you, and makes grossly unsuitable investments. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:29 am
Geier v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:20 am
" He also referenced at least twice the efforts by Chairman Shad back in the 1980s to ensure proper governance through the use of listing standards, an approach struck down by the DC Circuit in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
" (Ettinger v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:53 am
The court's "clearly incompatible" standard is new and (though it purports not to) seems to water down considerably the old "plain repugnancy" test of Gordon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
Sec. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
See SEC v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:51 am
The plaintiffs' bar is heavily lobbying the SEC to intervene in a pending Supreme Court case, Stoneridge v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:06 pm
SEC v. [read post]
