Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 1701 - 1720 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2016, 9:26 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
When the rider is wearing a helmet, that outer shell can help prevent minor punctures from sharp objects, such as rocks and branches. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 9:26 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
When the rider is wearing a helmet, that outer shell can help prevent minor punctures from sharp objects, such as rocks and branches. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
 This term has been no different, but my, how they have ended in a dramatic fashion with....drum roll please...a reference to the CJEU from Mr Justice Arnold on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896.The problem and the questions to be referred What do you do if your patent is about to expire, but despite notice that Member States have agreed to grant your marketing authorization (MA) under the decentralized… [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In 2014, less than 1,000 individuals were said to have benefited from successful EEOC systemic lawsuits, a sharp decline from the nearly 8,000 individuals in 2013. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 12:08 pm by Altman & Altman
  The worst vehicle in the group was a new Honda model, the HR-V. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Circuit ruled against the Obama Administration in Central United Life Insurance v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]