Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
Superior Court, 37 Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
Martin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 598; Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Henry Hernandez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:39 pm
The court remanded the case to the state court after finding that the federal claims did not constitute a covered class action under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) (Cervantes v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 8:17 am
One was an Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jeffrey S. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 11:16 am
Walmart Inc., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 6:17 am
Dunbar v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 9:36 pm
” The court noted that the California Supreme Court addressed the wording of this provision by stating that the statute did not create a broad right to use marijuana without hindrance or inconvenience. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Today, the Supreme Court of California in Winn v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 12:15 am
See When Will California's State Of Emergency End? [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:20 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, a civil procedure case involving a court’s specific jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants sued by out-of-state plaintiffs. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
In the course of the discussion, the Court said: We invited the parties to provide their comments on the recent United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am
The California Court of Appeals disagrees. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
Board of Trustees of California State University (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341, 363.) [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
June 12, 2014)The California Supreme Court here provides a relatively rare state court interpretation of the scope of an advertising-related insurance policy. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 pm
The Supreme Court granted review and depublished the court of appeal’s decision, stating: “Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Pinnacle Museum Tower Association v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
However, California state courts go even farther than the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:44 pm
Richey, but he didn't give up, appealing to the California Court of Appeals, which agreed with Mr. [read post]
