Search for: "State v. David."
Results 1701 - 1720
of 14,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
Jackson At the end of January, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut issued a decision in the matter of Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Kansas will be voting on whether to restore the individual right to keep and bear arms to state constitution, undoing the judicial nullification in Salina v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
David Savage noted that in a number of recent cases, invovling matters as diverse as election laws and lethal injection matters, the Court has rejected a broad attack on state laws. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 12:53 pm
A lawsuit, Bethel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
Jody May Walters and her husband David guaranteed loans for David's homebuilding business. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:34 am
Artunduaga v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
A key witness against him was David Stow, a detective and gang expert. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
In the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB) Nicol J held that a Government Press Release which meant that the claimant, Dr Salman Butt, was an extremist hate speaker constituted a statement of opinion, not of fact. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:22 pm
" The case involves the fact that from 1987 to 2001, Arnold Bengis, Jeffrey Noll and David Bengis (jointly, defendants) engaged in an elaborate scheme to illegally harvest large quantities of South Coast and West Coast rock lobsters in South African waters for export to the United States in violation of both South African and U.S. law. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:31 pm
David S. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Husted v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As in the years after Brown v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
Annor v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:46 pm
Over 20 years ago, the Washington State Supreme Court held in Nast v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
David A. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 7:18 pm
“Supreme Court skeptical of FBI’s claim in monitoring of Orange County Muslims”: David G. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Supreme Court.On a more local level, Justice David N. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
