Search for: "State v. German"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Winnebago County and Castle Rock v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
The National Socialist platform, adopted as official German state policy as of 1933, was committed to driving Jews and other “enemies of the State” out of economic life.This is the historical context in which modern claims to Nazi-looted art should be viewed.Too frequently, some of our judges seem to have forgotten history. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:12 am
In Canada, the Supreme Court ruledin Equustek v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm
As Lord Chief Justice Camden evocatively stated in Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Trials 1030, “the eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass”. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
"It's high time for those who wish to move forward with a higher form of cooperation to do so," said Peter Hintze, a German secretary of state. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:15 pm
He concluded by likening the Telekom case to the fictitious decades-long Jarndyce v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Since the principal contractual obligation was a debt of money, which had to be fulfilled under German law as well as under Austrian law at the debtor’s domicile (Munich), German (and not Austrian) courts had jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm
The International Court of Justice has issued its judgment in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Speaking on 13 January 2014, the European Data Protection supervisor backed German efforts to rebuild momentum towards data protection reforms. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 3:50 pm
Colding (1953) (noting that the First Amendment does not distinguish "between citizens and resident [noncitizens]"); United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 2:53 am
Christian German decided November 13, 2019. [read post]
