Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 2:30 am
The Respondent in Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll, FA1007001336979 (Nat. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
H.B. 232 does not apply to any person or entity subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, any person or entity subject to HIPAA, or any Kentucky agencies, local governments, or political subdivisions. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:33 am
Holder U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Apple necessarily failed to allege a concerted action between Samsung and ETSI necessary to state a claim under Section 1, the court held.The decision in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:28 am
Scope of applicabilityThe CJEU's [Huawei v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:18 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:27 pm
Id. at *5 (discussing with approval United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
Nantuckett Business Centre v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:09 pm
On June 9, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Quanta Computer, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:10 am
Resolving disputes involving the payment of a New York State Employees' Retirement System member's death benefit to a beneficiaryRice v Dinapoli, 2009 NY Slip Op 50979(U), Decided on May 21, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Joseph C. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Laffin v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
J. 131 (2013) in King v. [read post]
